top of page
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • X (Twitter)

Guts and Glory

  • Writer: Punam Medh
    Punam Medh
  • May 7
  • 10 min read

Updated: May 14

ree
Listen to Stories
A Shot Out of the Blue

On a warm June afternoon in 1822, a group of fur traders went about their business in a small trading post on Mackinac Island, Michigan. The day was ordinary, until it wasn’t. A gun fired. The sharp crack shattered the air, followed by shouts and the frantic shuffle of feet. When the smoke cleared, a young French-Canadian trapper, Alexis St. Martin, lay on the ground. The accidental shot had left behind a gaping wound in his abdomen, blood soaking through his clothes. With no hospital nearby, the traders carried him to the nearest military outpost. A surgeon was summoned. William Beaumont.


What happened next would not only save a life but open an unprecedented window into the workings of the human body.


A Strange Window

By the spring of 1824, a year and half after the shooting, Alexis had recovered completely. Even though the process was slow, Beaumont kept track of how the stomach was healing. He observed the minutest changes that took place in the wound and how it impacted Alexis’ digestion. The close and continuous

monitoring helped Beaumont notice that the folds of the skin on Alexis’ stomach had healed in a strange way.


William Beaumont’s Early Life


William Beaumont was born to a farmer in 1785, in Missouri, US. Young Beaumont was not keen to follow his father into farming. He wanted to do something different, something more. Eager to carve out a name for himself, Beaumont left his home when he was barely 20 years old. He took some money and a few tools with him and went in search of his fortune. It was while he was teaching in a school in New York that he developed an interest in medicine and decided to take it up as a career.


He began his apprenticeship under a doctor he met in New York. After two years of study, he received his license in to practice from the Medical Society of Vermont, US, in 1812.


Around the same time, a war broke out between Great Britain and the US. Beaumont joined the army and served as an assistant to a surgeon. He gained a lot of experience in tending to seriously wounded soldiers. At that time, he had no idea how his experience as a surgeon would lead him to an opportunity

to discover something that would be of great significance.


The Accident

It was almost ten years after Beaumont had earned his medical license, that he was called upon to attend to the accidental shooting of Alexis. Beaumont noticed that Alexis had suffered a horrible wound. The bullet had left him with a hole in the abdomen as large as the fist of a grown man. One of his lungs

was almost falling out of that gaping hole. He was losing blood and was in unbearable pain.


Beaumont had a lot of experience in working with wounded soldiers. Just fro looking at the size and severity of the wound, he surmised that the chances of survival for Alexis were slim. Yet, he swung into action to try and save Alexis’ life.


Among the first things Beaumont did was to clean up the blood and other particles from the wound. And as for the lung that hung precariously out of the wound, Beaumont actually placed it right back into the fractured rib cavity. Alexis continued to lose a lot of blood. He was not conscious for many days.


Inspite of the grave nature of this injury, Alexis survived. His treatment now came to a point where Beaumont had to get him to eat since nutrition plays an important role in patient recovery. But every time Beaumont tried to feed him, the food would ooze out of his stomach. So Beaumont started strapping it up to make sure that instead of oozing out, the food would be pushed forward into the alimentary track.


And thus began a long and arduous journey of recovery for Alexis under Beaumont’s care. Alternating between minor recoveries and major setbacks brought on by infections and violent fever, Alexis battled for his life. And he survived, owing to Beaumont’s care his sturdy constitution.


A year went by and soon Alexis was able to walk around. He also developed a healthy appetite and could eat. All his internal and external wounds had healed. Since Alexis had lost his job at the fur company, Beaumont hired him as a handy man who could help him with daily chores.


A Strange Window

By the spring of 1824, a year and half after the shooting, Alexis had recovered completely. Even though the process was slow, Beaumont kept track of how the stomach was healing. He observed the minutest changes that took place in the wound and how it impacted Alexis’ digestion. The close and continuous

monitoring helped Beaumont notice that the folds of the skin on Alexis’ stomach had healed in a strange way.

This new skin is not the skin that we all know, not thick and opaque. It was transparent, like glass! Beaumont realised that when Alexis lay down, turned slightly on one side, he could push the stomach area gently and see what was happening inside the stomach through this transparent skin. This accidental window, sometimes called a fistula, became a unique and unprecedented opportunity for studying the digestive process.


Through this window Beaumont was able to see the pale pink, slightly bumpy surface of the stomach. He could see a liquid sloshing up around food after it settled down on this surface. This liquid had the ability to change the appearance of food. Beaumont surmised that this was gastric juice. He

realized that he had been granted a unique opportunity. Most scientists before Beaumont had carried out their experiments on animals or cadavers.


Beaumont would be the first to study digestive physiology in a live human. Was this his opportunity to something different, something more? In the meantime, the fur company learnt about Alexis’ recovery and wanted him back. Beaumont was reluctant to let Alexis go. He did not want to lose the opportunity that was just granted to him – to understand the processes in the stomach, and thereby to do something worthwhile. So he convinced Alexis to stay back, offering him a generous stipend, accommodation and an opportunity to serve a larger purpose of science.


Alexis agreed to stay back.


The Study Begins

Beaumont had brought Alexis back from the brink of death. He maintained detailed records of every moment of this journey of recovery. With the same fervour, Beaumont began his experiments with Alexis formally, almost a year and a half after the accidental shooting.


His plan was to give Alexis different foods and observe what would happen to it inside the stomach.


He started by giving Alexis different types of food, both raw and cooked, like bread, cheese, vegetables, meat and fruit. He made detailed notes for each food type, the time taken for it to change its appearance and so on. Figure 3 : shows a picture of a page from Beaumont’s journal where you can see the

different types of food that was given.

Figure 2: Image of a table of diet articles and time taken to digest them. Time to Chymification refers to the time taken for the food to be broken into a semi-liquid form called chyme. Image sourced from William Beaumont’s book - Experiments and Observations on the Gastric Juice and the Physiology of Digestion, 1833.
Figure 2: Image of a table of diet articles and time taken to digest them. Time to Chymification refers to the time taken for the food to be broken into a semi-liquid form called chyme. Image sourced from William Beaumont’s book - Experiments and Observations on the Gastric Juice and the Physiology of Digestion, 1833.

Beaumont also tried to understand what partially digested food looks like. For this, he tied a small piece of food on a very thin string. Then, while keeping one end of the string in his own hand, he had Alexis swallow the other end on which the food was tied. A few minutes after Alexis swallowed the food, Beaumont

pulled the string out and tested the partially digested food.


He used the same technique of suspending food to collect gastric juice. When pieces of bread were suspended, gastric juice would be soaked up by the bread. Instead of waiting for the juice to act upon the bread, it was immediately pulled out. The juice was then squeezed out of the bread. Beaumont managed to collect enough to be able to conduct basic analysis on it. He also had

chemists conduct a more precise and advanced analysis on it.


In a span of around four to five years, Beaumont conducted over 238 experiments reaching 51 inferences.







Some of these inference and findings are summarized here, based on a book called Principles and Practices of Medicine by Sir William Osler (1892).

• Gastric juice is responsible for breaking down food, not just mechanical churning.

• Gastric juice could digest food even outside the stomach, proving its enzymatic activity.

• Gastric juice contained an acidic component that played a key role in digestion. With the help of chemists, he identified hydrochloric acid as part of gastric juice.

• Digestion was most efficient at body temperature (~37°C or 98.6°F).

• Cooling gastric juice outside the body slowed digestion.

• Stress, anger, and anxiety slowed digestion.

• Alcohol and poor diet also had negative effects on stomach function.

• The stomach could self-repair after injuries.

• The stomach processed food in phases, rather than all at once.

These findings laid the groundwork for modern gastroenterology and influenced later research on enzymes, digestion, and human physiology.


Beaumont published his experiments and findings in his book called Experiments and Observations on the Gastric Juice, and the Physiology of Digestion in 1833, almost nine years after he started in experiments on Alexis.


Several historians have elaborated the manner in which Beaumont published his work. First, a few months before the actual publishing of the book, Beaumont circulated a prospectus of the book. In this he described his experiments, highlighting his personal sacrifices for the cause of science. The prospectus included space for subscribers to order the volume. Within a month, newspapers and magazines wrote glowing stories about Beaumont’s remarkable work. And finally when the book was published a few months later, it received a another round of applause from the media as well as from the

scientific community.


Impact of Beaumont’s Work

Beaumont went on to receive recognition and honour in the US, earning him the title of Father of Gastric Physiology. His work was warmly received in Europe too.


Beaumont’s meticulous observation of Alexis’ fistula provided direct evidence that digestion involved chemical breakdown via gastric juices, particularly hydrochloric acid. He firmly established that digestion is a chemical and not a mechanical process where food was broken down by movement in the

stomach.


Beaumont’s experiment brought into wide focus the possibility and benefits of using fistulas as a window to view inside the working of organisms. Claude Bernard, A French physiologist, his contemporary in Europe, turned into a great admirer of Beaumont. He described Beaumont’s work as the commencement of a new era in the study of the stomach and became a great

proponent of vivisection or live dissection.


Another scientist who drew inspiration from Beaumont’s use of fistula was Ivan Pavlov, famous for his work on conditioned reflexes. Pavlov conducted extensive research on digestion. He developed the ‘Pavlov pouch’, a surgical technique that allowed scientists to isolate the stomach’s digestive processes without external contamination.


Beaumont's research set the stage for Theodor Schwann, a German physiologist, who within a few years of Beaumont’s publication, discovered pepsin, the first known enzyme responsible for protein digestion in the stomach. Schwann’s work built on Beaumont’s observations, confirming that

gastric juice was not only acidic but also contained specific agents that broke down proteins. This was one of the earliest enzyme discoveries and set the precedent for later enzymatic studies in physiology.

Beaumont’s Critics

Beaumont had his fair share of critics who raised concerns about the originality, methodology and conclusions of his experiments. One British writer estimated that only 12 out of the 51 inferences in Experiments and Observations contained any genuine novelty, arguing that the rest were already known before Beaumont’s studies. Additionally, some physiologists, especially those with vitalist perspectives, criticized his reductionist approach, opposing his portrayal of the stomach as a chemical laboratory.


Others raised concerns with experimental shortcomings in his work, pointing out his lack of physiological sophistication and his tendency to generalize from a single subject. European scientists, in particular, found his chemical techniques inadequate, arguing that his digestive rate table was misleading because he failed to use advanced chemical or microscopic methods. Critics

noted that he equated chymification with digestion and worked with complex foodstuffs instead of simple substances that could yield clearer results.


His own son, Samuel Beaumont, admitted that the first edition of the book contained numerous errors, conceding that one of the reviewers was justified in criticizing its many mistakes. Despite these critiques, Beaumont’s work remained a foundational study in gastric physiology.


What happened to Alexis?

Alexis was around 25 to 28 years old when he was near-fatally shot. Beaumont was his doctor, who brought him back to good health. But soon it became an ethically complex relationship between an experimenter and a subject. Alexis endured untold degrees of pain and discomfort as a subject of Beaumont’s experiments. He may have been indebted to his surgeon or tempted by the

lure of stipend and accommodation. During the years Alexis of experimentation, he ran away several times to his hometown, before finally parting ways with Beaumont in 1831. He continued to remain in Canada since he was a French Canadian. He went on to marry, fathered six children and died

at the age of 85.


Figure 3: Alexis St. Martin at the age of 81. Notice the position of the hole in the stomach. Image source: Wikimedia Commons.
Figure 3: Alexis St. Martin at the age of 81. Notice the position of the hole in the stomach. Image source: Wikimedia Commons.
Closing Thoughts

This story leaves us with a key question: Was William Beaumont’s title as the Father of Gastric Physiology justified, given that he discovered nothing entirely new?


To answer this, we must step back in time to the history of digestion research. The quest to understand what happens to food after ingestion dates back to Galen (129 CE). Over centuries, various scientists proposed and tested theories, as shown in the Location-Time Map (Figure 4). Beaumont contributed

by using systematic observations and controlled experiments to demonstrate how gastric juice acts on food, offering crucial insights into digestion.


Beyond this, historian Jerome Bylebyl highlights another reason for Beaumont’s significance: his work challenged the long-held idea of vitalism, a belief that life processes are governed by a force beyond physical and chemical laws. Despite his rudimentary techniques and conclusions that were later

refined, Beaumont’s research laid the foundation for future discoveries in digestion.


Beaumont’s work advanced our understanding of enzymatic activity, pH regulation and digestive hormones, but his story forces us to confront the delicate balance between scientific progress and ethical responsibility.


In the end, Guts and Glory is more than just a title. It reflects both the physical site of discovery and the determination of the man behind it. Beaumont, a military surgeon, brought the discipline and tenacity of his profession into the laboratory, and while his methods may be questioned, his impact remains

undeniable.


*End of Story*


Comentários


bottom of page